BANKROLL & RISK · ADVANCED · LIVE CASH ONLY
Compare cash stakes with Kelly.
See how your assumptions change a bankroll-based stake reference.
Free web tools · No account · No ads or tracking. Calculations stay in your browser.
Illustrative inputs throughout, including an ASSUMED live SD of 120 BB/100. Change them for your game. There is no universal measured “normal live SD”. This compares bankroll exposure, not how much to bet or shove in a hand.
MODELED BIG-BLIND REFERENCE
- Modeled typical buy-in
- Bankroll per modeled buy-in
- Equivalent reference buy-ins
- Your actual entered buy-in
- Entered buy-in depth
- Bankroll threshold at your current BB
One entered buy-in exceeds the entered poker bankroll. This page does not propose a higher game.
Cash-game model, using your assumed edge and variance. These can change across games and stakes. Kelly targets long-run growth and can still involve large drawdowns. This is a comparison, not a safe stake or a tournament bankroll rule.
Half Kelly is not a “safe stake” and does not mean zero ruin risk. Displayed amounts are rounded; comparisons use the unrounded threshold.
Made with GoodRun · Conditional model comparison.
Quarter, half and full.
These are fractions of Kelly exposure. The percentage of bankroll per buy-in is a different number. Full Kelly is not a recommendation.
Your entered games, under one assumption.
Assumes the same edge and SD at every listed stake. Different depth, rake caps, fixed money time fees, straddles or game quality can change both. Re-estimate them before interpreting a threshold. No room availability or move-up signal is inferred.
| Entered game | Bankroll threshold | Current bankroll vs reference |
|---|
What if the assumptions are less favorable?
Half the edge and 25% higher SD are separate stress scenarios, not confidence limits or universal conservative factors. The bankroll, entered BB, depth and selected Kelly fraction stay fixed.
| Scenario · BB/100 inputs | Modeled BB / buy-in | Bankroll per buy-in | Current-BB bankroll threshold |
|---|
If a plausible uncertainty range includes zero or a negative edge, positive sizing is not supported throughout that range. Assess uncertainty in an observed win rate separately →
Growth is a different question from ruin.
Kelly targets expected logarithmic wealth growth under an assumed distribution. It does not maximize the chance of winning the next hand or eliminate drawdowns. A short observed win rate is not proof of a true edge.
Proportional stake rebalancing differs from keeping one fixed stake, making withdrawals or needing a minimum buy-in. This page gives no Kelly ruin probability, drawdown forecast, shot-taking rule or tournament sizing. Fixed-stakes risk of ruin has its own model →. Check rake and direct playing fees separately →; enter the resulting net edge here without subtracting fees again.
The cash-poker approximation
Time t is in 100-hand blocks. With assumed true edge w BB/100, SD s BB for a 100-hand result, bankroll B and monetary big blind b, let a = b/B. The continuous model is dB/B = a × w × dt + a × s × dW. Its expected log-growth rate is g(a) = a × w − a² × s² / 2.
The derivative g′(a) = w − a × s² and g″(a) = −s² give full exposure aK = w / s². A fraction c uses ac = c × w / s², so modeled BB = B × c × w / s². For your entered depth k, bankroll fraction per buy-in = c × k × w / s², reference buy-ins = s² / (c × k × w), and bankroll threshold at entered BB bi = bi × s² / (c × w).
This assumes continuous rebalancing, constant edge/SD/depth across stakes, independent increments and no withdrawals or financing. It is a diffusion approximation to discrete cash poker. Mean and SD alone do not identify an exact discrete Kelly solution. Changing depth changes the buy-in description at unchanged edge/SD, but real game distributions can change with it.
Hourly inputs are converted once: w/hour = w/100 × hands/hour / 100 and SD/hour = SD/100 × √(hands/hour / 100). Mean divided by variance is unchanged by a consistent unit conversion; SD never scales linearly with time.
Sources and evidence limits
Edward Thorp on the Kelly objective; David Aldous, Berkeley: mean/variance approximation and uncertainty; Busseti, Ryu and Boyd: fractional versus risk-constrained Kelly. These sources explain the objective and limitations; none measures your edge or establishes a universal poker bankroll. The cash-poker unit derivation is stated above. Sources checked 1 November 2026.
The live NLHE/PLO SD starting points share the variance tool’s source and evidence labels. The defaults are assumed examples, not a measured live population.
Keep context for your next comparison.
Record sessions, stakes and expenses in GoodRun, then choose your own assumptions when comparing games.